Friday, April 06, 2007


I think my billing rate just went up, Max Schulz writes.

The irony is that the beneficiary of Monday's ruling won't be wind power, solar power, or any of the other renewable technologies favored by the Green establishment. Their economic and technological limitations are too severe for them ever to occupy more than a small niche in the American energy economy. Instead, one of the winners from Massachusetts v. EPA just may be something that many of the environmentalists who brought the suit have long abhorred: nuclear power. Like renewables, nuclear power generates electricity with no pollutants or greenhouse gas emissions. But unlike renewables, nuclear is capable of generating reliable power on a massive scale, which is what our country's future energy demands will require.

Nuclear power is on the verge of making a comeback in the United States. Thanks to several favorable provisions in the 2005 Energy Policy Act, as well as a streamlined licensing process, it is possible we could see the construction of new plants start within several years. The economics for new plant construction are still being worked out, particularly with regard to financing and federal loan guarantees. But there can be no doubt that federal efforts to hamstring coal can only help nuclear. Moreover, any future regulatory scheme allowing nuclear power plant operators to earn credits for generating emissions-free electricity would enhance nuclear's attractiveness to investors.

If you think the nuclear industry is happy with the ruling, think again. That's because the nuclear "industry," such as it is, consists of investor-owned utilities that own coal-fired power plants in addition to nuclear plants. Monday's decision, while potentially good for their nuclear holdings, is almost certainly bad for their coal ones.

Crybabies. The nuclear "industry" also includes many like me, Roadwhores we are called, available to work for the highest bidder. Demand is now outstripping supply by a dramatic margin.

Thank you Justice Kennedy.

Oh and by the way, Mark Belling often complains that only in the NFL can employers terminate the contracts of their employees without consequence. You can add contract engineers to that list.


Dad29 said...

Not perfectly accurate. Entergy was one of the amicus-filers in this case, and they're heavily into nukes...

Headless Blogger said...

Entergy begins paying for my services on Wednesday. They are adding the Palisades Nuclear Plant to their fleet.

Dad29 said...

Bring me some spent fuel. Need to set up hot-water heat for the house.

A couple of thousand feet of copper water-pipe would be nice, too!!!